Alexander Hamilton was the prototypical opportunist of the American Revolution: of obscure and humble origins, he longed for an escape from his lowly rank as accountant and, as Wood (2006) notes, it was "war" that Hamilton believed would provide just such an escape (p. 124). Hamilton's revolutionary character was found in this desire for opportunity out of crisis and displayed the future maxim of Rahm Emmanuel, "Let no good crisis go to waste," in a manner that suggests that Hamilton is indeed the progenitor of a centralized, fascistic government headed by a financial sector that has less interest in democratic ideals than it does in the control and steering of a new empire. This paper will explore the theme set out by Wood (2006) that shows how Alexander Hamilton was a revolutionary character whose special talents lay in the direction of fostering a new nation that could be effectively governed by powerful scions and members of the banking sector.
The overall theme identified by Wood (2006) in the chapter entitled "Alexander Hamilton and the Making of the Fiscal-Military State" is that Hamilton played a particularly useful revolutionary role in terms of connecting the dots between Washington's military leadership and the leadership of the financial elites of Wall Street, where so many memorable historical moments arose, such as Washington's oath of office in 1789 and the vote on the Bill of Rights. Hamilton served as the connecting link between Wall Street influence and the office of the President, playing fast and loose with the legislative body of government in terms of financial and centralizing principles.
As Woods (2006) highlights in one of the more important sub-themes of the chapter, Hamilton was the perfect sort of revolutionary for the upcoming American titans (he married into just such a family): eager, impassioned, skillful in rhetoric, and learned in numbers and Judaic ethics (he attended Hebrew school in the Caribbean), Hamilton represented all the qualities of an aspiring youngster in a new nation coming to terms with itself and the opportunities that presented themselves. First, as a lawyer, then as a Treasury Secretary, Hamilton showed a remarkable ability to sway public opinion so as to consolidate power in the hands of a private sector. Thus, while Washington was engaged in foreign and military matters, he gave his Treasury Secretary a free hand to pursue the nation's financial matters, of which Washington knew very little. So just as Washington served the revolution in terms of being a man of action, Hamilton served the revolution in terms of being a man of finance.
Another important sub-theme is that Hamilton's support of a strong centralized government put him at odds with Thomas Jefferson (Roark, Johnson, Cohen, Stage, Hartmann, 2012), whom Woods (2006) states has been canonized in a sense in recent times as a supporter of small government. Yet, small government was not part of Hamilton's thinking or of his revolutionary training: he was educated with a marketplace mentality, and with the Revolution (American and French) came a new financial power that descended straight down from the House of Rothschild and nestled firmly in the type of government that Hamilton sought to erect.
That Hamilton saw opportunity in crisis is no surprise considering his sense of the revolutionary times all around him. His ability to draw attention to himself by describing in vivid details a hurricane that had come through the West Indies won for him the support of some wealthy patrons who sent him to New York for further education before putting him into their service (Wood, 2006, p.…
Sources Used in Document:
Roark, J., Johnson, M., Cohen, P., Stage, S., Hartmann, S. (2012). The American
Promise. NY: St. Martin's.
Wood, G. (2006). Revolutionary Characters: What Made the Founders Different. UK:
Pictures on the news of American flags being burned seem to appear more often than they used to. Perhaps my generation just isn't used to having our nation criticized to the extent that it has been since our response to September 11; we all know there have been anti-American protests in the past, that flags have been burned and protests against certain American military endeavors waged. Anti-Americanism has many definitions
The U.S. Debate over Membership in the League of Nations
After the end of World War I, the world was weary of war and the ravages that it had taken on the European continent and it would seem reasonable to suggest that policymakers on both sides of the Atlantic would be eager to form some type of league to resolve future conflicts. According to Margulies (1998), "Following the signing of the
In fact, during the 1787 Constitutional Convention, Slonim notes that the need for a bill of rights was not even a topic of discussion until Virginian delegate George Mason raised the issue just several days before the Convention was scheduled to rise on September 17; Mason suggested that a bill of rights "would give great quiet to the people." Following this assertion, Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts moved that the
Size/Cooperative Learning & it's effects on participation
Action Research Question
Will cooperative learning have a significantly positive impact on smaller or larger classes?
The purpose of this study was to investigate if cooperative learning will have a significantly positive impact on smaller or larger classes. In order to have valid results, I used both my largest and smallest classes as my sampling. I also incorporated a variety of teaching styles with cooperative
In this encouragement, American would help to touch off something
perhaps all the more miraculous given the proximity to its oppression to
the European peasantry at large. First in the doctrines which would be
formulated in the wake of French independence and secondly in the way that
Napoleon Bonaparte would begin the spread of such doctrines to a continent
driven by inequality, America's revolution could be said to have been the
opening round in the deconstruction